Skip to content
OpenLGBT

Display settings


Methodology

This page lays out everything behind our quizzes: which constructs each one borrows, where the items come from, how scoring works, and what the limitations are. Honesty is this site’s most important feature.

Three hard rules

Honesty statement: these quizzes are not validated instruments

Our items are written originally by this project and go through a community-review process (ongoing), but they have not undergone psychometric reliability/validity testing — which is true of nearly every online quiz; most just don’t tell you. Treat results as a starting point for sorting out your feelings, never as a conclusion.

How scoring works

All scoring is a pure function with public logic: agreement items count 1–5 (reversed items flip to 6−x), averaged per dimension and normalized; spectrum positions derive from the ratio of two axes; the Klein grid is shown cell by cell. Scoring code runs only in your browser — an architectural fact, not a policy promise, and you can verify it on the data-flow demo page.

Conceptual sources of the eight quizzes

Orientation Spectrum

The Kinsey 0–6 continuum concept + Sell’s attraction/behavior/emotion components

The Kinsey Institute states there is no “official Kinsey test”; ours is an original implementation inspired by the concept, yielding a 0–6+X position. The 1948-era single-axis limitation is disclosed on the result page.

Two-Axis Attraction

Storms’ (1980) two-dimensional model

Same- and other-gender attraction measured as independent axes; all items are original and attraction-worded, avoiding the original scale’s arousal-based items.

Klein Grid

The 7-dimension × 3-timeframe framework of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid

The framework itself is not copyrightable; the original wording belongs to the American Institute of Bisexuality — our implementation uses entirely original wording.

Gender Dimensions Explorer

Genderbread Person v4 (released to the public domain by its author)

Not a test: self-placed sliders, no scoring, never a label verdict. It is our deliberate alternative to any gender-dysphoria screener — a “dysphoria score” on a consumer site reads like a diagnosis.

Identity Journey

Constructs from the Cass (1979) six-stage model

Results are shown as resonance, not a stage verdict; the model’s linearity assumption and vintage are disclosed, alongside D’Augelli’s lifespan view.

Outness Spectrum

The life-domain construct of the Outness Inventory (Mohr & Fassinger, 2000)

An original reconstruction, not the scale’s items; results stress that no level of outness is right or wrong, and selective outness is the norm.

Ally Attitudes

The Riddle attitude continuum (eight levels)

Key insight: tolerance and acceptance still sit in the negative half of the continuum. Original scenario-based items.

Knowledge Quiz

Public facts (terminology, history, law, health science)

Facts are not copyrightable; each question carries an explanation with dates/sources.

How the support interstitial triggers

One quiz currently (“Identity Journey”) contains a few items flagged as distress signals (e.g., about shame or panic). If any flagged item scores 4 or higher on the 5-point scale, a gentle interstitial appears before your result with a link to local helplines. It can always be skipped and never blocks your result.

Acknowledgments and citations

We gratefully acknowledge the intellectual contributions of: Alfred Kinsey et al. (1948); Michael Storms (1980); Fritz Klein (1978/1985 — framework courtesy to the American Institute of Bisexuality); Vivienne Cass (1979); Jonathan Mohr & Ruth Fassinger (2000 — construct use notified by letter); Dorothy Riddle (c. 1973–74); Sam Killermann (Genderbread v4, public domain). This site is affiliated with none of these researchers or organizations.

For content standards, see the editorial policy →